Understanding Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Training in Canada: A National Survey of Recent Graduates
CANSAGE ePoster Library. Papillon Smith J. 09/27/19; 275238; eP-105
Jessica Papillon Smith
Jessica Papillon Smith
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

You may also access this content "anytime, anywhere" with the Free MULTILEARNING App for iOS and Android
Rate & Comment (0)
Objective: To characterize the fellowship training experiences in the eleven Canadian minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) programs and to compare them to that of AAGL-accredited MIGS programs. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey study of the 2017-2018 graduates from Canadian MIGS programs. A 90-item pre-tested questionnaire was administered using SurveyMonkey and measured four key constructs: surgical exposure, research/academic endeavors, teaching/evaluation methods, and clinical responsibilities. Results: The response rate was 91% (20/22) and all 11 programs were represented. The minimum standards for 12/16 (75%) AAGL-required procedures were met by all programs. Programs were deficient in providing exposure to: office hysteroscopy (6/11), laparoscopic resection of deep endometriosis (3/11), laparoscopic myomectomy (2/11), laparoscopic adhesiolysis (1/11), and laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection (1/11). Although all fellowships met the minimum volume of 110 minimally invasive hysterectomies, not all provided exposure to vaginal hysterectomy (3/11) and robotics (10/11). The academic activities of graduates was mixed: 14/20 had at least one manuscript published while 6/20 had none, and 12/20 concomitantly undertook a postgraduate degree. With regards to teaching, 10/20 reported having a structured curriculum, and 15/20 believed there would be benefit to standardizing training. The following were graduates’ career plans: academic center (14/20), community center (4/20) and undetermined (2/20). Conclusion: There are currently 11 well-established MIGS fellowship programs in Canada that differ in structure and focus, but that meet most requirements of AAGL-accredited programs. Given the variation identified in this survey, there may be an opportunity to standardize MIGS training nationwide and tailor it to a Canadian setting.
    This eLearning portal is powered by:
    This eLearning portal is powered by MULTIEPORTAL
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.

Save Settings